I just had to comment on the NAHB green building program. saying that it will take over the LEED H Green Buidling Program by the USGBC is a comment that really does not need to be made. Comments like this are what can lead to limiting progress instead of increasing it, we can really exist together, and they are two really different programs with two differnt markets.....NAHB had to define green building to its builder members before it was defined for them-this is all good, but two really different programs with different goals...
It is great that both programs can exist in the same market and move the suppliers, sub contractors, manafacturers, local goverments, contractors, realtors, etc to building more sustainable homes and buildings. but the programs are different. LEED H is a higher level program ( i did not say better ) but the program concentrates on the top 25% of home bulders in teh nation and moving them to building more sustainable energy efficient homes with the goal of zero energy in time. This program is constantly moving towards better and better building and increasing the thershold. like Energy star homes program the requirements are increased moving home building forward, and unlike Energy star or NAHB green building, LEED H is not meant to be marketed to the nations majority of home builders. so we have two great programs ( and many others i might add ) that are moving two seperate percentages of home builders to build "green". the differeneces are that LEED H has a third party varification requirement ( not so with NAHB-it is left up to the local chapter to make requirements), there are more requirements in LEED H that building professionals, building science proffesionals, energy raters, etc spent the last 8 years revising and testing to make sure the program had the integrity they wanted. NAHB does as well but the requirements are less stringent and were made up of the builder memebers ( builders, suppliers, manafacturers, subcontracors etc ) so there are things allowed or not required in NAHB that LEED H will not accept. Also NAHB is just defing its program, how they are going to administer the program, how they are educating the raters etc. I was a certified rater with NAHB but felt that I did not like some of the program acceptance or the influence of the NAHB on the program so opted out, not that I thinnk it is bad, just felt I wanted a program like LEEDH. I will point out as well that builder associations in some parts of the country have adopted LEED H or more stringent green building programs instead of NAHB green. This is all good, lets not concentrate on which one if better (depends on your prospective and goals for being green) lets concentrate on how we can move the industry along to more sustainable housing for all. if this is NAHB green for the majority homes fine, but for some they will only build LEED H, for some it will only be the living home challenge, or the passive home, or colorodo green build, or Earth Advantage, or Green Build, or............... it all good, confusiing some times but good. In the end what do we want to acheive? more durrable, sustainable, healthy and energy efficient homes right? it is faster if we all do it together instaead of bickering over which way is better. depends client or building. Also I might point out that USGBC green building programs are not just here in the united states but world wide-differnt goals for different programs.